Equality Charter School News - 0 views

• 
  #1 Anton Kennedy on 27 Mar 12

   

  Others - usually in the guise of think tanks together with lobby groups - are occasionally ideologically biased, or religiously-committed and, often, at the service of special interests.
  
  NGO's - like the International Crisis Group : have openly interfered on behalf of the opposition in that recent elections in Macedonia. Other NGO's did so in Belarus and Ukraine, Zimbabwe and Israel, Nigeria and Thailand, Slovakia and Hungary - and in many cases in Western, rich, countries including the USA, Canada, Germany, together with Belgium.
  
  The encroachment on state sovereignty of world law - enshrined in numerous treaties and conventions : allows NGO's to try hitherto strictly domestic extramarital affairs like corruption, civil rights, the composition of your media, the penal and civil codes, environmental plans, or the allocation of economic resources and with natural endowments, such as land and water. No field of government activity is right now exempt from the glare involving NGO's. They serve as self-appointed witnesses, judges, jury and executioner rolled into one.
  
  Regardless of their persuasion or modus operandi, just about all NGO's are top large with entrenched, well-remunerated, extravagantly-perked bureaucracies. Opacity is typical of NGO's. Amnesty's rules prevent its officials from publicly dealing with the inner workings of the organization - proposals, debates, opinions - until they also have become officially voted into its Mandate. Thus, dissenting views rarely get an available hearing.
  
  Not like their teachings, the loans of NGO's is inevitably obscure and their sponsors mysterious. The bulk of the income of all non-governmental organizations, even the main ones, comes from - usually foreign - capabilities. Many NGO's serve since official contractors for governments.
  
  NGO's serve for as long arms of their sponsoring reports - gathering intelligence, burnishing their own image, and promoting their interests. There is a revolving door relating to the staff of NGO's and government bureaucracies the world over. The British Foreign Office finances a host of NGO's - including the fiercely "independent" Global See - in troubled spots, such as Angola. Many host governments accuse NGO's associated with - unwittingly or knowingly - serving as hotbeds with espionage.
  
  Not many NGO's derive some of their total income from public additions and donations. The bigger NGO's spend one tenth health of their budget on PR and solicitation of charity. In the desperate bid to get international attention, so some of them lied about their projects inside Rwanda crisis in 1994, recounts "The Economist", that the Red Cross felt compelled to draw up a ten point imperative NGO code of honesty. A code of run was adopted in 1995. But the phenomenon recurred in Kosovo.
  
  All NGO's claim being not for profit : yet, many of them have got sizable equity portfolios together with abuse their position to boost the market share associated with firms they own. Clashes of interest and unethical behavior abound.
  
  Cafedirect is a British firm committed to "fair trade" coffee. Oxfam, a great NGO, embarked on a campaign directed at Cafedirect's competitors, accusing them of exploiting growers by paying them a smallish fraction of the retail price of the coffee they sell. Nevertheless, Oxfam owns 25% of Cafedirect.
  
  Significant NGO's resemble multinational businesses in structure and operation. They are hierarchical, keep up large media, government lobbying, and PR departments, head-hunt, shell out proceeds in professionally-managed portfolios, remain competitive in government tenders, and own various unrelated businesses. equality charter school news, equality charter school news, equality charter

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Others - usually in the guise of think tanks together with lobby groups - are occasionally ideologically biased, or religiously-committed and, often, at the service of special interests. <br /> <br /> NGO's - like the International Crisis Group : have openly interfered on behalf of the opposition in that recent elections in Macedonia. Other NGO's did so in Belarus and Ukraine, Zimbabwe and Israel, Nigeria and Thailand, Slovakia and Hungary - and in many cases in Western, rich, countries including the USA, Canada, Germany, together with Belgium. <br /> <br /> The encroachment on state sovereignty of world law - enshrined in numerous treaties and conventions : allows NGO's to try hitherto strictly domestic extramarital affairs like corruption, civil rights, the composition of your media, the penal and civil codes, environmental plans, or the allocation of economic resources and with natural endowments, such as land and water. No field of government activity is right now exempt from the glare involving NGO's. They serve as self-appointed witnesses, judges, jury and executioner rolled into one. <br /> <br /> Regardless of their persuasion or modus operandi, just about all NGO's are top large with entrenched, well-remunerated, extravagantly-perked bureaucracies. Opacity is typical of NGO's. Amnesty's rules prevent its officials from publicly dealing with the inner workings of the organization - proposals, debates, opinions - until they also have become officially voted into its Mandate. Thus, dissenting views rarely get an available hearing. <br /> <br /> Not like their teachings, the loans of NGO's is inevitably obscure and their sponsors mysterious. The bulk of the income of all non-governmental organizations, even the main ones, comes from - usually foreign - capabilities. Many NGO's serve since official contractors for governments. <br /> <br /> NGO's serve for as long arms of their sponsoring reports - gathering intelligence, burnishing their own image, and promoting their interests. There is a revolving door relating to the staff of NGO's and government bureaucracies the world over. The British Foreign Office finances a host of NGO's - including the fiercely "independent" Global See - in troubled spots, such as Angola. Many host governments accuse NGO's associated with - unwittingly or knowingly - serving as hotbeds with espionage. <br /> <br /> Not many NGO's derive some of their total income from public additions and donations. The bigger NGO's spend one tenth health of their budget on PR and solicitation of charity. In the desperate bid to get international attention, so some of them lied about their projects inside Rwanda crisis in 1994, recounts "The Economist", that the Red Cross felt compelled to draw up a ten point imperative NGO code of honesty. A code of run was adopted in 1995. But the phenomenon recurred in Kosovo. <br /> <br /> All NGO's claim being not for profit : yet, many of them have got sizable equity portfolios together with abuse their position to boost the market share associated with firms they own. Clashes of interest and unethical behavior abound. <br /> <br /> Cafedirect is a British firm committed to "fair trade" coffee. Oxfam, a great NGO, embarked on a campaign directed at Cafedirect's competitors, accusing them of exploiting growers by paying them a smallish fraction of the retail price of the coffee they sell. Nevertheless, Oxfam owns 25% of Cafedirect. <br /> <br /> Significant NGO's resemble multinational businesses in structure and operation. They are hierarchical, keep up large media, government lobbying, and PR departments, head-hunt, shell out proceeds in professionally-managed portfolios, remain competitive in government tenders, and own various unrelated businesses. <a href="http://www.prlog.org/11771884-1st-annual-bowl-for-equality-charter-school.html" rel="nofollow">equality charter school news</a>, <a href="http://www.prlog.org/11822170-equality-charter-school-raises-more-than-8000-in-annual-bowl-for-equality-event.html" rel="nofollow">equality charter school news</a>, <a href="http://www.prlog.org/11785258-equality-charter-school-continues-to-help-the-co-op-city-community.html" rel="nofollow">equality charter</a></div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top